Beyond "liberal conservatism"

 Belgium, Netherlands, Germany,.. all have had for the last two decades, or to be precise at least the last 15 years, mostly been run by governments that are "centrum right".

That means "liberal conservatism".

(Belgium, the dominane of NVA, MR, VLD, CdV)

(NL has Rutte since 2011, before that was Balkenende since 2002)

(Germany has Merkel since 2005)

(None of these is socialist or leftist qua political compass)

I hope that in the following years, people will finally wake up that this is precisely the problem.

The idea that one can combine "conservatism" with "liberalism" must be strongly refuted.

And I do mean "classical liberalism".

Another big error, highlighted by Sid Lukassen, was allowing conservatives take economic policies, while simultaneously let the socialists have education and welfare, as was costum in many "democracies", this was a grave error.

Countries like these West Euro Germanic states are culturelly ethnically and economically ruined, far more than socialist states have been.

One of the reasons the much more socialist France annoys the muslims so much, is precisely because there is a French Nationalism that dares to show its teeth, that dares to defend its secularism.

And in contrast to the American nationalism, French nationalism is very much against capitalism and classical liberalism, it is, even in its "conservative" and "rightwing" forms, unabashedly socialist!

Even socialist regions or countries like say Wallonia and Italia, while being socialist, and having left wing governments, will still be nationalist when they need to be. Italian leftists, Wallonian socialists,.. love to take the money from gullible Germanic Euros.

There is need for a conservatism, nationalism that is not blindly pro liberalism and capitalism, but that endorses nationalism, protectionism, when it suits them.

Successes of Trump and Brexit were the birth of this.

Liberalism 2

Both world wars of 20th century have made sure that every conservatism of the European type, has been bombed into obsoleteness.

The only "rightwing" allowed, was the one imported from the Anglosphere: "conservatism" of the "small government, free market" type.

A conservatism solidly focusing its primary energies on the battlefield surrounding theology, family, nationality is a conservatism that has been forgotten after the world wars.

A society based on individualism and shopping malls can do absolutely nothing when it is invaded by a society that worships the sacred war.

If we want to survive as Whites, as Europeans, we need to find something with more muscle and backbone that American consumerism.

Furthermore, it is the Anglosphere where sjw'ism and multiculturalism originated.

Marxism properly is not concerned with cultural relativism.

In Asia, in South Europe, Marxism was not shy to outright BAN islam.

In Asia, Africa and latin America, Marxism was easily combined with nationalism.

People associated with Frankfurter Schule, Marcuse and Adorno, were in fact concerned with the mind-numbing effects of consumerism. They would be conservatives by today's standards!

Multiculturalism was born in Anglosphere societies. Even today Macron reminded the world that multiculturalism is not a part of the French heritage, nor of the Enlightenment.

Macron is no ethnat. But this is a small step in the right direction.

European assertivity really does need a skepticism as solidly anti-liberal as it needs to be anti-marxist.

We need a renewal of faith. A faith that is FOR US, BY US.

Liberalism

"liberalism" has a different meaning in the Anglosphere and the rest of the world.

Especially in America, "liberalism" means what everywhere else is called "leftism".

However, to many people outside America, it becomes obvious that Anglosphere conservatism is essentially "liberal".

To these non-Anglos, "liberalism" does not mean "leftism", but it means a philosophy centred around market-worship and individualism, not necessarily egalitarian.

The Anglos would call this "libertarianism".

Because of believing that "libertarianism" and market-fundamentalism are "not leftism", conservatives in the anglosphere feel comfortable defending and approprating these things.

However, in terms of cultural and ethnic preservation, market-fundamentalism, liberalism, are just as destructive as marxism.

The mechanism however, is different;

Marxism forbids conservatism, cultural expressions. (1984)

Liberalism, capitalism does not need to forbid higher culture and traditions. It drowns them in irrelevance, hedonism, consumerism. (Brave New World)

Eventually one is left with no culture to defend, except the culture of free immigration, every worker being replaceable. Such a society has no use for race, gender, religion, class, tradition.

The problem of the Western world today, is not solely marxism.

The ideology of the UN and the EUro, is not marxist, but liberal, in the market sense.

Conservatives are unable to form a solid criticism, because they too are market liberals and individualists. 

Macron and Marianne: Distinguishing between Anglosphere multiculturalism and French laicité!

There is the idea, which is not exclusive to Marianne Magazine or Macron at all, that the Anglosphere is a distinct culture from other Western / White / Euro countries.
(cf: Daniel Hannan, "how the English speaking people made the modern world", for a positive treatment of the very same idea)

What Macron and Marianne are getting at, is that the Anglosphere, especially American media, are blaming France for its terrorist problems, by arguing that French secularism is a religion, that France is being intolerant etc.
They say this is due to American culture and sensibilities.
Macron argues American culture is rooted in segregation and subsequently multiculturalism, both seem to foster parallel societies.
On the other hand, French culture is emphatically NOT rooted in multiculturalism but in laicité.

I think it's very good to see a European country asserting itself against multiculturalism.
A West European country especially.
That he distinguishes between laicism and multicul is very important, I believe.
Rejecting multiculturalism is the first step to reasserting ourselves against nihilism.
He certainly is no alt-rightist, but it's still a far better position than defending "e pluribus unum" in a multicul way like conservatives nowadays do.
The french ideology of laicism seems to provide much better guard against islamic terror than American culture, with its multiculturalism.

I think it's a good development that they bring light to the idea that American sensibilities do not necessarily have to translate to Europe.
Remember a few months ago, while Anglo-American cops were kneeling for BLM, what did "globalist" Macron say? "The Republic will not remove a single statue, nor erase a single trace of its history".

https://www.bfmtv.com/international/macron-critique-la-couverture-des-attentats-islamistes-en-france-par-les-medias-anglo-saxons_AD-202011160051.html
https://www.marianne.net/societe/medias/apres-les-attentats-islamistes-en-france-la-presse-americaine-fait-le-proces-de-la-laicite

De teloorgang van de NVA

Ik denk dat de NVA nog niet half beseft in welk negatief predicament de partij zelf zit.
Wat Filip De Winter in 2010 zei, bleek uiteindelijk volledig waar: de rechtse Vlaming stemde NVA en niet langer VB als poging het Cordon Sanitaire te omzeilen.
Het zou echter een kwestie van tijd zijn vooraleer de rechtse kiezer zou terugkeren naar het origineel als blijkt dat de kopie een zwakke kopie zou zijn.
Reeds veel Vlaams arbeiders hebben al afgehaakt wat betreft steun voor de NVA. Met haar economisch liberalisme heeft ze de Vlaamse arbeider weinig te bieden, die zich door globalisme in de steek gelaten voelt. Nu ook blijkt dat voor ondernemers de NVA niets is dan een Belgicistisch schoothondje, zal ook dat kiezersdeel voor de NVA verloren gaan.

De NVA profileerde zich lange tijd ook als "een deftig alternatief" tegenover de "vulgaire" stijl van het VB. Het is ironisch dat tien jaar later het VB een deftige motie van wantrouwen indient tegen Wilmes en de NVA niet verder komt dan wat kinderlijk staan te schreeuwen in het parlement. Nota bene dan nog bij monde van mensen als De Roover en Van Peel, uitgerekend 2 van de meest uitgesproken personen die zich wouden profileren als zijnde de "rationele" en "intellectuele" zijde van rechts Vlaanderen, tegen de "net-niet analfabetische" VB'ers zoals De Roover het noemde of het electoraat dat Van Peel beneden haar stand vond.

De NVA is de rechtervleugel van de VLD. De grote meerderheid van NVA'ers komt uit het rechtsere deel van het Vlaamse liberalisme.
De NVA maakte zich sterk door zich te profileren op economisch rechts.
Als dat economisch "rechts", na Vlaamse arbeiders te doen afhaken, nu ook voor de Vlaamse ondernemers niets te bieden heeft, want blind achter Belgicistische consensus aanlopen, wat blijft er dan nog over als reden om voor de NVA te stemmen??

Het is aan de NVA te danken dat VLD en CdenV in de periode 2010-2020 in de regeringen zat.
En gaandeweg kwamen daar ook lokaal Groen en SPA bij.
Men profileerde zich door te zeggen dat stemmen op VB, stemmen op "links" zou zijn. Maar men hielp zelf de SPA en Groen aan boord, niet in het minst in symboolstad Antwerpen.

De NVA is de rechtervleugel van de VLD en is in hetzelfde bedje ziek. Hetzelfde myopische liberalisme met dezelfde contradictorische persoonsverheerlijking van de leider.

Geen enkele andere partij deificieert in Vlaanderen haar leider zo hard als de NVA dat met voorzitter BDW doet. En net als haar liberale compagnons bij de VLD is men blind voor de gevolgen van cultureel liberalisme.
Een multiraciale democratie werkt niet op lange termijn, en economisch en ideologisch liberalisme is net zo destructief als marxisme, alleen duurt het langer eer de effecten daarvan zichtbaar zijn.
De NVA spiegelt zich graag aan de Anglosfeer, maar vergeet daarbij dat geen enkel Anglosfeer land er tot op heden in slaagt om dat raciaal-blinde liberaal democratisme te laten werken op een vreedzame manier. Overal steekt identitair antagonisme de kop op. En zoiets los je niet op met slogans. 

Music Review: Cyba Drum Recordings 003

Review: Peter Kurten & Antichristus Cyba drum recordings 003 

 
Excellent two-tracker offering us one track by Peter Kurten and another by AntiChristus.
Typical of the late 2000s, early 2010s hardcore & dnb mixture.
This was slightly before "Crossbreed" as a genre took over.
This was the "hardstep" dnb subgenre.
What's interesting here is that we hear a lot of different bassdrums, the programme is done so that the tempo is not as often broken, as I found often the case with regular "crossbreed".
Accordingly, this is a drum n bass release that warms the heart of any hardcore purist like myself.

Well done. 

Since I can no longer post reviews on discogs.
I post every review here from now on.

Vegan malnutrition

 

Interesting compilation by sv3rige, showcasing vegans, and their decripit health.. I like this comment: "The video is painful to watch. Also because I used to be a vegan for 4 years.

I now believe my totally natural and human interests in nutrition and justice, where misled by corporate propaganda. Leftists think they are beyond propaganda, but veganism is in reality green capitalism, at least. confronted with the fact that it is malnutrition and the policies that some push on society, one might wonder, is it being promoted purposefully to make us weak??? In either case, veganism is unhealthy. There is also a certain hysteria in vegan behaviour. You see it in bloggers, vloggers, and real life. It's no wonder antifas are so violent, if you take into account what veganism does, and then combine this with their rampant drug use. veganism deprives you of some solid sources for especially vit b12 and vit d. Defincies of these vitamins have long been linked to agressive and erratic behaviour, even psychosis. now, combine this with the usage of drugs that deplete your neurotransmitters, or with a brain fog-inducing drug like weed. And don't forget for women, iron deficiency, and the intake of antidepressants and the depression following use of birth control pills. this really explains today's women who are at once conscious about the planet and the animals, but need to act animalistic in search for the next alpha dick. vit d is linked in a proportional relationship with testosterone, a both that has a steady production or supply of one, can also supply or preserve solid amounts of the other, but if one of either is deficient, so is the other. so this would be a nutritional proof for the stereotype of most vegans, if male, being effeminate, emasculated. we give kids hormones to be trans, but a man taking steroids is made fun of. we promote vegan diets, and we demonize natural, healthy, animal fats. we give people so many pharms, and demonize natural, mind expanding drugs and drug-free techniques to cope with mental stress. Even if all of this is not part of an evil agenda to destroy us, at least, we are victim to green capitalism."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPUTH0ZOBJ4