Europa is Raped - Who to Blame & What to Do?

i often wonder who first came up with the idea to flood europe with naffers.

the centre islamique belge was opened by our catholic monarch, so to blame solely "leftism" or "atheism" is entirely dishonest and incomplete at the least.

west europe got multicultural democratic socialism

this it got imported via america, after world war ii american victory, europe was finally under the cultural influence of americanism.

in american universities had crept a new form of leftism, which is incorrectly called "cultural marxism", even though its basic premises are opposite of marxism.

"cultural marxism", the "new left", is cultural relativist, whereas marxism is anti relativism.

"cultural marxism" is hedonist and individualist, orithinal marxism was against these two very much.

east europe, like cuba, china, russia got the old school marxism: no hedonism, or individualism, but oldschool marxism: the labourer will have toi use a gun, and things like lgbt and rock music are considered western, decadent and imperialist opia for the masses, to be forbidden and eschewed, because not as important as the class war that will put an end to history, just like in earlier generations this was thought to be achieved by either waiting for the messiah or by fastening his return through asceticism or puritanism.

the eastern, old school marxism, was always quickly reverting to an anti western nationalism and left most of traditional morals intact

in western europe, economies got loosely capitalist, but qua morality, the new socialism was more powerful, the new left "frankfurter schule" attacked identity of western peoples itself.

but there is to my knowledge nowhere in frankfurther schule any mentioning of mass immigration or multiculturalism.

this latter thing seems to be something linked to the colonial past of certain countries: to sidestep the native labourer forces, one uses the "cheap" labour from ex colonies, this explains the nationalities of various west european countries main immigration almost ALWAYS correlating to the ex colonies of such countries. (except in scandinavia? they never had colonies?)

the has been found a few examples of Social Democratic leftists lauding and applauding the arrival of these people, in a sort of pyramid scheme to ensure "fascism" never creeps up again.

Many of the merchant tribe had also supported it for this reason.

After a few decades, leftist parties generally counted upon these people to keep electorically in power.

Everyone who worked in this scheme should ideally be treated the way traitors are traited.

They should all get the Cox treatment of course

East Europe and Russia, china, North Korea got culturally less damage due to adopting an oldschool marxism, yet economically they got it worse

However, West Europa and America got "new left", many of its basic premises becoming even accepted among its "rightwing" factions.

Most importantly the racial egalitarianism (racial nihilism?), and the defence of democracy as a good thing.

Both are undeniably leftist in origin: the former is impossible without accepting the premises of Gould, Marx, Mead, Boas

The latter is impossible without first accepting that it would be an improvement over the old Monarchism, the apex of true conservatism.

Unthinkable to have conservatives at the time of French Revolution accept democratism over monarchism.

One can not defeat an ideologically while one gives it the moral highground.

Thus AYn Rand comes to mind, arguing conservatism as defenseless against socialism because of its conservative altruism.

Has she been proven right? The Sanders fans also referred to Sanders as likewise to Jesus as "the judean guy attacking bankers".

To truly oppose leftism, one must identify its moral premises and reject them outright.

The basis of leftism is utopianism through egalitarian socialism.

Take one of these three away and the leftism has been demolished, rendered impotent.

What is leftism without egalitarianism? It loses its very identity.

What is leftism without socialism? a mere suggestion.

What is leftism without its utopianism? A mere ideology to be seen as the fraudulent thought it is, for weaklings and dreamers.

the true right then rejects egalitarianism in all senses:

woman is not equal to man; man must be above women, this is what woman also wants and the only way to guarantee solid families.

white is not equal to black: genetics matter and intelligence is not something that is cured by having a few newcomers classes and allowing them to study in their own language or subsidies here and there.

blue collar is not equal to white collar: capitalism is superior to socialism and the ceo does deserve a higher wage than the manual labourer.

The dalai lama has shown us precisely that.

If the west must have a religion, as conservatives insist we should, then it should be one who does not preach sacrifice as the highest moral value.

Christianity preaches sacrifice as the highest moral value, and so does leftism.

Buddhism does not, Buddhism preaches compassion, but not self sacrifice, as a moral value.

Hence Pope Francis, Merkel and Obama are fully christian when they offer their land to the pillaging horde, whereas Dala Lama clearly spoke that the ideal solution would be that those refugees are to return to their own home and rebuild it.

This idea is not even granted any merit among the ecclesiastical and political representatives of multiculturalism.

The catholic & orthodox churches of europe, pray for the refugees.

The catholic church sees Mohammed's followers as fellow allies in the battle against secularism of its own European populace.

From these corners we don't need any help.

After suffering bolshevism, Eastern Europe will reap rewards for distancing from Western multicultural socialism as well.

If it manages to ward off both stalinist bolshevism and multicultural socialism, the benefits are for them to reap.

Western Europe is a lost case.

One should perhaps better invest ones own energy in being an ascetic monk, guarding the knowledge to somewhere else.

Perhaps that's because for me, i've always seen more honor in the ascetic monk than the political way.

Some blame atheism, but i would blame democratism.

After all, it was democracy that allowed for those, whoever they may be, to carry out the multicultural ideals, it is democratism that allows for people to bitch while not doing anything, investing all hope in politicians as their secular messias instead of rabbi yeshua of older generations.